Decreasing vertical impact loads via increasing ankle loads in Chi Runners

Posted on September 14, 2013 by admin

Hot on the heels of the systematic review last week that confirmed the adage that you can’t decrease the load in one tissue without increasing it in another and that different running techniques load different tissues differently , we have another study: A Comparison of Negative Joint Work and Vertical Ground Reaction Force Loading Rates between Chi Runners and Rearfoot Striking Runners Donald Lee Goss & Michael T. Gross J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 9 September 2013 Study Design Observational

Visit link:
Decreasing vertical impact loads via increasing ankle loads in Chi Runners

Related posts:

  1. Knee and ankle loads in forefoot vs rearfoot striking
  2. Knee and ankle loads in forefoot vs rearfoot striking
  3. Increasing cadence and patellofemoral forces
  4. Landing Pattern Modification to Improve Patellofemoral Pain in Runners
  5. Efficacy of Adjustable Toe Splint on Decreasing Metatarsalgia
  6. Impact Reduction Through Changing to Midfoot Strike Pattern vs Low Drop Footwear
  7. Running economy: Forefoot vs Rearfoot striking
  8. Impact reduction through long-term intervention in recreational runners: midfoot strike pattern…
  9. Top of Foot Pain in Runners
  10. JFAR debuts as #1 ranked foot and ankle journal according to Impact Factor
  11. JFAR debuts as #1 ranked foot and ankle journal according to Impact Factor
  12. Efficacy of Adjustable Toe Splint on Decreasing Metatarsalgia
  13. Foot Strike and Injury Rates in Endurance Runners: a retrospective study
  14. Calcaneal stress fracture – forefoot or rearfoot strikers?
  15. Rearfoot vs. Midfoot vs. Forefoot Striking Running: Which is Best?
This entry was posted in Sports Medicine and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *