Why ‘one size does not fit all’ when it comes to running

Posted on November 9, 2013 by admin

I have been promising these thoughts for a while. When you look at all the studies on running economy , the bulk of them are either showing that heel striking is more economical or that there is no difference between forefoot/midfoot vs rearfoot striking in running economy. The evidence does not support the rhetoric and propaganda from the fan boys for the one size fits all

Continued here:
Why ‘one size does not fit all’ when it comes to running

Related posts:

  1. Heel-Striking Running is More Energy Efficient Than Midfoot-Striking Running
  2. Running economy: Forefoot vs Rearfoot striking
  3. Rearfoot vs. Midfoot vs. Forefoot Striking Running: Which is Best?
  4. Yet another study shows heel striking is more efficient than midfoot striking
  5. Running Shoes and Economy of Running
  6. Rearfoot vs. Midfoot vs. Forefoot Striking Running: Which is Best?
  7. Running Shoes and Running Economy
  8. Kirby article and the midfoot
  9. Effect of 0 and 4mm drop running shoes on running economy
  10. Kirby and the Midfoot
  11. Kirby article and the midfoot
  12. Pose Running and Running Economy
  13. Myths of Running: Forefoot, Barefoot and Otherwise
  14. Rearfoot Striking is Preferred Method of Footstrike for Ultramarathoners
  15. Myths of Running: Forefoot, Barefoot and Otherwise
This entry was posted in Running Shoes, Sports Medicine and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.